Thursday, October 4, 2012

Insight: Delays dog U.S. government loans to green energy projects

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A year after the U.S. government raced to meet a deadline to finish loan agreements with dozens of clean energy companies, less than half the total money promised has been handed over.

Technical questions and companies' own failures in hitting contractual milestones are behind some of the holdups.

But government officials fearful of taking a risk on firms that could collapse may have also caused some of the delays. The political firestorm after the failure of Solyndra, a solar panel maker that went bankrupt last year after receiving more than $527 million in a government loan, may have made the authorities wary, industry experts and investors say.

The Energy Department and some companies say the pace of disbursement reflects an appropriately cautious approach to handling taxpayer investment in nascent industries. In some cases, though, the rigid approval process for drawing on loans has frustrated recipients, who feel the government is withholding cash due to minor setbacks.

A Reuters analysis of Treasury Department data on payments to 19 solar, wind and geothermal power projects of the 26 in the Energy Department's portfolio shows that the pace at which funds have been released has been slow and uneven. Funding for the other seven loans, amounting to a combined $5.6 billion, comes from private lenders, with the Energy Department guaranteeing 80 percent of the principal. The department declined to discuss these loan disbursements.

(For a graphic, see http://link.reuters.com/ped92t)

The Treasury Department data provides a glimpse into how things are faring for the program, which the Obama administration hailed as a major job creator that would help wean the United States off its dependence on foreign sources of fossil fuels. The program was crafted during the Bush administration but funded as part of the 2009 economic stimulus.

"One of the things it tells you is that the program became highly politicized and it gridlocked the process of doling out money," said Theodore O'Neill of Litchfield Hills Research, after seeing the results of the Reuters review.

The Solyndra failure has become a stock part of stump speeches leading up the November 6 U.S. elections, including those of Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney, who argues that the government should not be in the business of picking winners and losers. He says Washington is not good at it, and should not put taxpayer money at risk in the process.

Only 47 percent of the total approved funding, or $4.9 billion, had gone out the door by August 31 for the 19 projects receiving their loans directly from the Federal Financing Bank, a division of the Treasury Department.

Four projects have not received any of their promised funding, including two solar manufacturing projects that O'Neill and other analysts say have only faint hope of reaching viable commercial production because of stiff competition from China. Another five projects have received less than half the loan funds that were pledged.

Some projects have seen disbursements withheld until they meet contract milestones with the Energy Department, which approves the payments.

"Whatever it is, things are not going right with their original investment," said Jim Nelson, a solar cell entrepreneur who had a long career in private equity, including working at Bain and Co with Romney.

For critics like Nelson, the slow pace of loan disbursement is one more sign that the government is not an efficient financier. He said he does not expect his company, Solar 3D, to need government help to commercialize its technology.

AWKWARD PARTNER

Renewable energy projects in general have been hurt by low natural gas prices, uncertainty about federal tax credits, and the failure of Congress to legislate a federal mandate for using solar, wind and geothermal power.

Loan recipients also faced more government scrutiny after the failure of Solyndra, which received monthly payments right up until seven days before it shut its doors.

Since then, the government has withheld money for projects with signs of technical problems. But that can lead to a "downward spiral," said one private investor familiar with some of the projects.

Without the money, the companies can't fix the problems - and unless they are resolved, it is difficult for the firms to seek additional private capital they need to keep going, the investor said.

Earlier this year, a geothermal project at a hot springs in eastern Oregon ran into technical issues.

An injection well U.S. Geothermal had drilled was performing below expectations, and before the Energy Department would release regular monthly disbursements, the company needed to show it had equity to cover additional drilling costs.

"We found ourselves responding to a significant amount of questions" from the government, said U.S. Geothermal's CEO Daniel Kunz, noting that the delay meant one small local contractor had trouble paying employees.

U.S. Geothermal went without monthly disbursements again in June and July because of government questions about a single $100 invoice that held up more than $7 million in payments.

"They got into some real minute issues, and they're entitled to do that," said Kunz, who stressed that he was grateful for the loan.

When it came to the additional drilling costs, U.S. Geothermal turned to its equity partner, Enbridge Inc, a Canadian pipeline company and original investor. Enbridge kicked in an extra $6 million in exchange for hiking in its ownership stake from 27 percent to 40 percent.

Kunz expects the project will be producing power, which it will sell under a long-term sales contract, by the year's end.

Abound Solar was not as fortunate. After receiving 17 percent of its $400 million government loan, the solar panel manufacturer's payments were cut off by the Energy Department in August last year because panel prices had collapsed.

"While we understood the increasing market risks driving this decision, and understood the technical justifications in the loan documents, we also knew that it put enormous financial strain on our small company," Chief Executive Craig Witsoe told lawmakers in July, shortly after Abound filed for bankruptcy.

CAUTIOUS PACE

More than 12 percent of the money that has been handed out by the Treasury so far went to Solyndra, Abound and Beacon Power, an energy storage project that also later filed for bankruptcy.

Kevin Smith, CEO of Santa Monica, California-based SolarReserve, worries that all the loan projects are getting unfairly characterized as duds to score political points.

SolarReserve got a $737 million loan guarantee for a solar plant in Nevada, the largest of its type in the world.

"To use these short-term successes and failures to play politics is just too dangerous for us as a nation," he said, adding that there should be a long-term view on the need to move away from fossil-based fuels.

Smith said he considered the government's cautious pace of loan disbursement appropriate. "The level of scrutiny by the Department of Energy and their advisors is at a much higher level than you would see in commercial project finance."

For the 19 projects covered in the Treasury Department data, the Energy Department declined to comment on whether there are targets or goals for getting the $5.1 billion remaining in promised loans released.

"The portfolio has been thoroughly evaluated by independent experts who determined that our practice of ensuring loan recipients can only access loan funds gradually as they meet financial and construction milestones is an important protection for the taxpayers," Damien LaVera, an Energy Department spokesman, said in an e-mailed statement.

"In some cases, the agreements specifically require significant portions of the equity in a project to be raised before any loan funds can be disbursed," LaVera said.

NO MONEY YET

Four projects promised Treasury Department loans have yet to see any disbursements, including Abengoa's cellulosic ethanol plant in Kansas.

Abengoa's executive vice president, Chris Standlee, said he expects the ethanol project to begin drawing on the loan soon. Its plant has been under construction for a year, and the terms of the loan require that it use its own equity first.

Another company still waiting to tap its $197 million loan, SoloPower, opened a solar panel manufacturing plant in Portland, Oregon last week.

The company can begin to tap funds once it has its first production line up and running, and meets other undisclosed milestones. SoloPower's chief executive Tim Harris said he believes his firm underwent a more rigorous review than Solyndra.

"Our initial due diligence was 14,000 pages," Harris said. "I call us the most heavily due-diligenced company in the world. It sure feels that way."

HUNDREDS OF MILESTONES

SolarReserve's power plant in Nevada has about 200 milestones for which paperwork must be submitted to the Energy Department. The Crescent Dunes plant will use thousands of mirrors to reflect sunlight onto a tower of molten salt, where heat will be stored until it is needed to create power.

The project is a year into its 30-month construction schedule. By the end of August, it had received only 21 percent of its loan, which CEO Smith said reflected the typical pace of building a plant.

Most of the early project work focused on engineering and procurement, Smith said in an interview. But Crescent Dunes will soon enter the most cash-intensive part of construction and in the next few months, employment will jump from 220 to about 600.

While Smith said his funding was on schedule, he said the government did not move as swiftly as a private-sector lender because it required more documentation and had more levels of review.

It took two years to finalize the loan guarantee, a process that in the private sector would take six to eight months.

Still, Smith said the program filled a "commercialization gap" for an emerging industry struggling to find lenders after the 2008 financial crisis. "Trying to finance that ... two years ago when we were still in the heart of economic downturn was virtually impossible," he said.

(Additional reporting by Nichola Groom in Los Angeles; Editing by Martin Howell, Karey Wutkowski and David Brunnstrom)

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/insight-delays-dog-u-government-loans-green-energy-200905939.html

gunner kiel gunner kiel groundhog soulja boy did the groundhog see his shadow punxsutawney phil groundhog day

Tuesday, October 2, 2012

How sexual power can be disempowering

ScienceDaily (Oct. 1, 2012) ? The commonly held belief that men should dominate sexually can disempower both women and men, according to a new study.

Gender roles and norms play a key role in sexual behavior between men and women. It is often assumed that men should dominate women sexually. This assumption may lead to loss of both power and the ability to control sexual behavior among women and men, as well as lead to increased sexual risk-taking, such as not using a female condom. The new study, by Dr. Lisa Rosenthal from Yale University in the US, and her colleagues, is published online in Springer's journal Sex Roles.

Social dominance orientation is a measure of people's level of support for social power inequalities and hierarchy. The belief is linked to greater hostile sexism, more negative attitudes towards women's rights, a greater tolerance of sexual harassment and a greater preference for traditional gender roles. Rosenthal and team examined whether the extent to which both women and men endorse social dominance orientation explains gender dominance and dynamics in heterosexual relationships.

A total of 357 undergraduate women and 126 undergraduate men from a Northeastern US university took part in the study. Participants were asked to complete a questionnaire on a computer, next to which there was a bowl of female condoms. The researchers assessed the students' social dominance orientation, the extent to which they believed that men should dominate sexually, how confident they felt in sexual situations, as well as the number of female condoms they took away with them.

Overall, women were less likely than men to endorse the view that men should dominate sexually. The more men and women believed that social power inequalities and hierarchy were valid, the more likely they were to endorse the belief that men should dominate sexually, and the less likely they were to feel confident in sexual situations and consider using female condoms.

The authors conclude: "These findings suggest that beliefs about power may play a key role in both women's and men's attitudes to sexual behavior, and potentially their decisions to protect themselves during sexual activity. Results highlight that social dominance orientation and dynamics in heterosexual relationships do not only hurt women, but also men because they potentially decrease their sexual self-efficacy and interest in female condoms as well."

Share this story on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:

Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:


Story Source:

The above story is reprinted from materials provided by Springer Science+Business Media.

Note: Materials may be edited for content and length. For further information, please contact the source cited above.


Journal Reference:

  1. Lisa Rosenthal, Sheri R. Levy, Valerie A. Earnshaw. Social Dominance Orientation Relates to Believing Men Should Dominate Sexually, Sexual Self-Efficacy, and Taking Free Female Condoms Among Undergraduate Women and Men. Sex Roles, 2012; DOI: 10.1007/s11199-012-0207-6

Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of ScienceDaily or its staff.

Source: http://feeds.sciencedaily.com/~r/sciencedaily/living_well/~3/D7yTCxQ8mr0/121001095517.htm

delilah nevis 2012 sports illustrated swimsuit same day flower delivery valentines day westminster dog show valentines day cards

Movie Mogul's Role in Fundraising for Obama (WSJ)

Share With Friends: Share on FacebookTweet ThisPost to Google-BuzzSend on GmailPost to Linked-InSubscribe to This Feed | Rss To Twitter | Politics - Top Stories News, RSS and RSS Feed via Feedzilla.

Source: http://news.feedzilla.com/en_us/stories/politics/top-stories/252225326?client_source=feed&format=rss

jo paterno dead south carolina tuskegee airmen mike james red tails red tails heidi klum

Leaseweb Volume Network for video streaming - Web Hosting Talk

Junior Guru Wannabe

?

Join Date: Mar 2012

Posts: 79


I plan to get the Leaseweb server on volume network to run my video streaming site.

Another choice is Choopa(USA) which have a better speed.
Leaseweb advantage is have more option of bandwidth upgrade, 250mbps, 500mbps, 1gbps.

I'm worry about the volume network and suspect it is only a shared port. Choopa is confirm have a dedicated port, but only 100mbps and 1000mbps.




Web Hosting Guru

?

Join Date: Dec 2009

Posts: 347

I would suggest contacting the providers directly. Most providers will not have clients on a dedicated PORT unless they are running unmetered bandwidth. But to be sure, contact them. Good luck!


__________________
Rob@HIVELOCITY.NET
Award Winning Dedicated Servers
24/7 Impressive Technical Support- Huge Reseller Discounts
Best Dedicated Server Price Every Time- 1 click away

Web Hosting Master

?

Join Date: Aug 2007

Location: Rotterdam

Posts: 2,188

Yeah contact their sales to verify and confirm. I don't think the connections are dedicated. Most budget providers still use 'shared' ports.


__________________
Kind Regards, 24x7 Holding B.V contains:
?? Instant Dedicated - Unmanaged VPS/Dedicated in Europe/NL || Get online, in no time!
?? Global Layer - Value-added IP services worldwide || A global player in networking

Randy

?

Join Date: Aug 2006

Location: Ashburn VA, San Diego CA

Posts: 3,485

Leaseweb's network is massive. I really doubt they are oversubscribing customer ports -- they just don't need to.


__________________
Fast Serv Networks, LLC | AS29889 | Dedicated, Cloud, Streaming and more...
Auto OS Install | IPMI | Routed Private Network w/VPN | Managed Services

Junior Guru Wannabe

?

Join Date: Mar 2012

Posts: 79

Leaseweb just confirm it is on dedicated port too.

Is 100mbps unlimited dedicated port really mean you can get 100mbps speed always ?

Let's say they put 100 users on a 1000mbps, it is ONLY 10mbps per user and assume most user comsume less bandwidth. Can they said you are on a 100mbps DEDICATED PORT in these case ?


Junior Guru Wannabe

?

Join Date: Mar 2012

Posts: 79

Quote:

I would suggest contacting the providers directly. Most providers will not have clients on a dedicated PORT unless they are running unmetered bandwidth. But to be sure, contact them. Good luck!

How come the Hivelocity 1Gbps Unmetered Port cost only $499 while other charge $1000-$2000 ?

I ask your sales, they told me it is on dedicated port.
Honestly, do i really get what most provider told me, DEDICATED PORT ?

I mean when they put too many users on a quite full pipe, i don't always get what i have been promise(full 100mbps speed) on a so call DEDICATED PORT.


Web Hosting Master

?

Join Date: Jun 2004

Location: Europe

Posts: 2,591

Quote:

How come the Hivelocity 1Gbps Unmetered Port cost only $499 while other charge $1000-$2000 ?

Actually around $500,- would be a realistic price nowadays for a dedicated, unmetered gigabit port from providers that purchase their bandwidth in large amount (and no doubt, Hivelocity is one of those that buy larger amounts of bandwidth). It is a realistic price for 1 Gbps dedicated.

Web Hosting Master

?

Join Date: Oct 2007

Location: United States

Posts: 1,077

Pretty doable charging $500/mo for 1Gbps on single server. However, once you get 10-20 servers for that price, and they are all bursting at the same time, then it may not be sustainable...


__________________
www.DMEHosting.com - DME Hosting LLC | Servers, KVM/OpenVZ VPS's, Email Hosting, Web Hosting

Web Hosting Master

?

Join Date: Jun 2004

Location: Europe

Posts: 2,591

Quote:

Pretty doable charging $500/mo for 1Gbps on single server. However, once you get 10-20 servers for that price, and they are all bursting at the same time, then it may not be sustainable...

That would actually be sustainable!. However, lately a lot of starting streaming platform clients try host from 10 to a few hundred x 100TB and 50TB servers with gigabit ports at $50 - $150 each and try burst to full gigabit at the same time - that - is not sustainable!

Randy

?

Join Date: Aug 2006

Location: Ashburn VA, San Diego CA

Posts: 3,485

Quote:

Pretty doable charging $500/mo for 1Gbps on single server. However, once you get 10-20 servers for that price, and they are all bursting at the same time, then it may not be sustainable...

Sustainable, but not very profitable. In reality those 10-20 servers won't burst at the same time. Unless they are all part of a CDN of sorts (aka the whole softlayer/simplecdn fiasco).
__________________
Fast Serv Networks, LLC | AS29889 | Dedicated, Cloud, Streaming and more...
Auto OS Install | IPMI | Routed Private Network w/VPN | Managed Services

Web Hosting Master

?

Join Date: Jun 2004

Location: Europe

Posts: 2,591

Quote:

Sustainable, but not very profitable. In reality those 10-20 servers won't burst at the same time. Unless they are all part of a CDN of sorts.

Lately a group of clients doing streaming are shopping around for 'affordable servers' - going for 50TB and 100TB dedicated port deals. They burst at the same time to full gigabit with every server they have (generally 10 - 40 each) as they all stream the same content at the same time.
Unfortunately, not sustainable or profitable on 50TB / 100TB deals at $50 - $150 per server but it would definitely be sustainable and profitable on $500,- - $700,- dedicated gigabit ports.

Web Hosting Master

?

Join Date: Oct 2007

Location: United States

Posts: 1,077

Quote:

Lately a group of clients doing streaming are shopping around for 'affordable servers' - going for 50TB and 100TB dedicated port deals. They burst at the same time to full gigabit with every server they have (generally 10 - 40 each) as they all stream the same content at the same time.
Unfortunately, not sustainable or profitable on 50TB / 100TB deals at $50 - $150 per server but it would definitely be sustainable and profitable on $500,- - $700,- dedicated gigabit ports.

It is extremely rare, but I've seen a single client have 10-20 servers pushing 900Mbps at 95th percentile in a month. All bursting at the same time. $500-$700 model quickly become obsolete unless you want to work for free. Not sure how it's possible to include servers, power, rack space, cab, networking, salary, and all the other costs for $0.50-$0.70/Mbps...
__________________
www.DMEHosting.com - DME Hosting LLC | Servers, KVM/OpenVZ VPS's, Email Hosting, Web Hosting

Web Hosting Master

?

Join Date: Jun 2004

Location: Europe

Posts: 2,591

Quote:

Not sure how it's possible to include servers, power, rack space, cab, networking, salary, and all the other costs for $0.50-$0.70/Mbps...

You can but IPT for quite a bit less then $0,50 / mbit, especially if you can commit to 20 Gbps or more and yes, even from the premium IPT providers if you work with a reseller.
I cannot disclose our IPT buy pricing, but i can tell you its lower then $0,50 / mbit and count on top of that the savings made by peering of traffic.... and i can assure you that $0,50 per megabit sell price can be quite profitable.

Junior Guru Wannabe

?

Join Date: Jan 2012

Posts: 84

Quote:

I plan to get the Leaseweb server on volume network to run my video streaming site.

Another choice is Choopa(USA) which have a better speed.
Leaseweb advantage is have more option of bandwidth upgrade, 250mbps, 500mbps, 1gbps.

I'm worry about the volume network and suspect it is only a shared port. Choopa is confirm have a dedicated port, but only 100mbps and 1000mbps.

Leaseweb has the best network in Europe. Never had problems even in the peak hours. I pushed about 98 Mbps on 100 Mbps port. They are simply great(but a little bit expensive)

My recommendations for video streaming :
1. Leaseweb (899 EUR for 1 Gbps)
2. Hetzner ( 1 TB - 5 EUR )
3. i3d.net ( 100 TB server for 175 EUR). Has some minor problems with bandwidth in the past, but they resolved it quickly.


__________________
Servers up and running @: i3d.net , leaseweb.com, swiftway.net, hetzner.de, webcare360.com, ovh.lt, databank.lt
VPS: IntoVPS, LoveVPS, databank.lt, hetzner.de


Last edited by ambernet; Today at 05:58 AM.

Web Hosting Guru

?

Join Date: May 2009

Posts: 315

I don't think LeaseWeb allows streaming on 1gbps / 100TB deals without their prior written consent. I would double-check if I were you.


__________________
? KnownSRV.com - Fast, Quality and Secure MANAGED VPS with multiple drives in h/w RAID10.
? Quality comes at a price, and we provide it at affordable prices.
? PayPal, Skrill(MoneyBookers), Payza(AlertPay), 2CheckOut and LibertyReserve accepted!





Posting Rules

You may not post new threads

You may not post replies

You may not post attachments

You may not edit your posts


HTML code is Off


Source: http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=1196721

no child left behind no child left behind neurofibromatosis steve jobs fbi file suge knight obama birth control mortgage settlement

Monday, October 1, 2012

Jeffrey Epstein and the American Cancer Society tackle genetic resistance to drugs

NEW YORK, Sept. 28, 2012 /PRNewswire/ -- There are two common dilemmas in the treatment of cancer today: the first is that many therapies, including chemotherapies and radiation can debilitate healthy cells, to the point of killing the person before defeating the cancer. The second problem is that many cancer cells, responding to a prevention drug, can quickly mutate to become immune and more resilient.

Recent advances in circulating tumor cell technology (CTC) however, headed by Dr. Daniel Haber, Director at Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Dr. Mehmet Toner, Director of the Center for BioMicroElectroMechanical Systems, address this mutation problem head on. Their research has also found support from The American Association of Cancer Research, the American Cancer Society and The Jeffrey Epstein VI Foundation, which supports cutting edge medical research around the world.

CTC is a simple blood test to detect circulating cancer cells. Using a microfluidic chip, the test isolates cancer cells in the blood and allows them to be purified to analyze their genetic structure. Although many challenges remain in the test, the advantages have already made a huge impact on the treatment of cancer. To date, the test has identified more than 1,200 cancer-causing genetic mutations, the largest collection in the world. The findings have led to a host of mutation specific targeted therapies including the use of reversible and irreversible inhibitors, which have been highly effective in tumor reduction. For instance, Dr. Haber's team recently found that gastric adenocarcinomas, stemming from amplification of the growth factor receptor gene c-MET, only respond to novel inhibitors of the MET tyrosine kinase, leading to the initiation of a genotype-directed clinical trial.

Critically, the CTC test also addresses the major problem of secondary and tertiary genetic mutation to treatment. For while targeted inhibitors can be highly effective in tumor shrinkage, almost all cancer cells quickly mutate to be resistant, reversing tumor reduction within six to eight months. Furthermore, resistance becomes effective from the slightest evolution. For example, approximately half of non-small cell lung cancer cases with mutations to EGFR TK inhibitors became resistant from a single mutation of T790M within the EGFR kinase domain. Indeed, the bulkier methionine residue at position T790M hinders interaction with the inhibitor, preventing binding to the EGFR kinase domain while preserving catalytic activity. An analogous mutation (T315I) in the BCR-ABL fusion kinase in chronic myelogenous leukemia cells renders them resistant to ABL kinase inhibitors, gleevec and dasatinib.

By extracting cancer cells from a CTC blood test however, a patient can be analyzed in genetic real time, meaning a continual genetic analysis to determine the first line of treatment and then a secondary or third line of treatment, as soon as any resistive mutations occur. In fact, since treatment can be tested on the patient's cells in vitro--and from a blood sample relatively quickly and accurately--as compared to a biopsy, any secondary or tertiary mutations detected in the cell culture, can be treated preemptively as part of the first line of attack, as a cocktail with the primary treatment or in immediate sequence. Unlike a blood test however, tumor biopsies can be hugely debilitating, costly, genetically outdated, not always easy to locate and can encourage metastasis of the tumor.

By using the microfluidic test, Dr. Haber's team has a growing catalog of secondary and tertiary mutations and has shown how several irreversible inhibitors produce significant, if not permanent anti-tumor activity on a variety of secondary mutations such as the EGFR receptor double mutation, L858R/T790M. Some of these irreversible inhibitors, namely HKI-272, EKB-569, BIBW2992, and PF00299804, are currently undergoing clinical testing.

Technically, the CTC microfluidic chip test works by taking only 10 milliliters of blood, containing about 80 billion cells. Magnetic beads on the chip are coated with antibodies that bind to both EpCAM positive and EpCAM negative cells (epithelial cell adhesion molecules), a common marker present on CTCs originating from epithelial cancers. The binding of antibodies, makes the CTC cells detectable and ready for extraction via purification.

The toxic effect of genetic therapies are significantly less than standard chemotherapy drugs, due to their receptor specificity, however toxicity is still a major hurdle and can cause heart disease, gastrointestinal damage and the development of other cancers. "The CTC test is not only increasingly specific to the mutation driving the cancer," Jeffrey Epstein countered, whose foundation supports cutting edge medical and science research around the world, "but doses can be closely minimized to tumor reduction and secondary treatments can be given in tandem or immediately thereafter."

Source: www.jeffreyepstein.org

www.jeffreyepstein.org

CONTACT: Christina Galbraith, The Jeffrey Epstein VI Foundation,+1-917-573-7604, http://www.jeffreyepstein.org

Web site: http://www.jeffreyepstein.org/

Source: http://www.lef.org/news/LefDailyNews.htm?NewsID=16017&Section=Disease

rachel zoe penn state football mt rainier national park rose parade mount rainier national park drop dead gorgeous ticket city bowl

The Healing Power of Shutting Up (Unqualified Offerings)

Share With Friends: Share on FacebookTweet ThisPost to Google-BuzzSend on GmailPost to Linked-InSubscribe to This Feed | Rss To Twitter | Politics - Top Stories News, RSS Feeds and Widgets via Feedzilla.

Source: http://news.feedzilla.com/en_us/stories/politics/top-stories/252391444?client_source=feed&format=rss

dale earnhardt jr michigan primary school shooting daytona 500 winner cleveland plain dealer barry sanders barry sanders

YouTube Partners With ABC News To Offer Its First-Ever Live Stream Of The U.S. Presidential Debates

Google politics and electionsFor the first time ever, YouTube will offer a live video stream of the U.S. presidential and vice presidential debates this year. To do this, YouTube has partnered with ABC News and the debates will stream on ABC News' YouTube channel and YouTube's Election Hub. The four debates, which will start on October 3 at 9pm ET, will be available for YouTube viewers around the world. YouTube's election page will also feature commentary and analysis from seven other partners: Al Jazeera English, BuzzFeed, Larry King, New York Times, Phil DeFranco, Univision and the Wall Street Journal.

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/i1y7sGa3xcw/

quinton coples a.j. jenkins riley reiff david decastro aj jenkins shea mcclellin nfl draft 2012