The two heavyweights of economic statistics are released this week, but the with both the job market stats and numbers on economic growth, competing systems of data collection and presentation can sometimes create confusion.
A man with one clock always knows?the time. A man with two clocks is never sure.
Skip to next paragraph Donald MarronDonald B. Marron is director of the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center. He previously served as a member of the President's Council of Economic Advisers and as acting director of the Congressional Budget Office.
Recent posts
This week brings the two heavyweights of economic statistics. On Thursday morning we got the latest read on?economic growth, and on Friday we learn how the?job market fared in May.
Government statisticians and outside commenters usually emphasize a particular headline number in these reports. For the economy as a whole, it?s the annual growth rate of gross domestic product (GDP), which logged in at a mediocre 1.9 percent in the first quarter. For jobs, it?s the number of nonfarm payroll jobs created in the past month (115,000 in April,?but that will be revised on Friday morning).
In each case, the government also reports a second measure of essentially the same thing.?Jobs day aficionados are familiar with this. The payroll figure comes from a survey of employers, but the Bureau of Labor Statistics also reports?results from a survey of people. That provides the other famous?job metric, the unemployment rate, and?a second count of how many people have a job. The concept isn?t exactly the same as the payroll measure?it includes a broader array of jobs,?for example,?but doesn?t?reflect people holding multiple jobs?but it?s sufficiently similar that?it can be an interesting check on the more-quoted?payroll figure.
The downside of this extra information, however, is that it can?foster?confusion. In April, for example, payrolls increased by 115,000, but the household measure of employment fell by 169,000.?Did jobs grow or decline in April?
Another, less well-known?example happens with the GDP data. The Bureau of Economic Analysis calculates this figure two different ways: by adding up production to get GDP and by adding up incomes to get gross domestic income (GDI). In principle, these should be identical. In practice, they differ because of?measurement challenges. As Brad Plummer notes in a piece?channeling Wharton economist Justin Wolfers, the two measures tell somewhat different stories about recent economic growth.?In Q1, for example, GDI expanded at a respectable 2.7 percent, much faster than the 1.9 percent recorded?for GDP. Is the economy doing ok or barely plodding?along?
Such confusion is the curse of having two clocks. We can?t be sure which measure to believe. Experts offer good reasons to prefer the payroll figure (e.g., it?s based on a much larger survey) and GDP (e.g., income measurement?is difficult for various technical reasons, including?capital gains). But there are counterviews?as well; for example,?at least one paper finds that GDI does a better job of capturing swings in the business cycle.
Despite this confusion,?two clocks are better than one. They remind us of the fundamental uncertainty in economic measurement. That uncertainty is often overlooked in the rush to analyze the latest economic data, but it is real. There are limits to what we know about the state of the economy.
In addition, a weighted average of two readings?may well provide a better reading than either one alone. If one clock says 11:40 and another says 11:50, for example, you?d probably do?well to guess that it?s 11:45. Unless, of course, you have reason to believe that one clock is better than the other.
The same may well be true for GDP and GDI?- the truth is likely in the middle. (This is less true with the jobs data; because of the larger sample, I weight the payroll measure much more heavily than the household measure, at least for monthly changes.)
P.S. For more on GDP vs. GDI, see Dean Baker?and Binyamin Appelbaum.
The Christian Science Monitor has assembled a diverse group of the best economy-related bloggers out there. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here. To add or view a comment on a guest blog, please go to the blogger's own site by clicking on dmarron.com.
idiocracy deep impact usssa baseball alex o loughlin the godfather cape breton bowling green
?Copyright 1997-